Visit to get much more information about this book, come buy it in print, or to download it together a totally free PDF.


FIGURE 3-1 full juvenile arrests in the united States, 1980 to 2010. SOURCES: Snyder and Mulako-Wangota (2011). Approximates for 2010 calculated straight using data from commonwealth Bureau of investigation (2011).

You are watching: What type of trial is most common in the juvenile court?

the late 1980s and early 1990s is clearly apparent (see number 3-2). The complete arrest price for offenses in the FBI’s Violent Crime Index prospered from 299 to 503 youth arrests every 100,000 between 1980 and 1994, before falling come 270 every 100,000 in 2004. After ~ fluctuating for numerous years, the violent crime arrest price dropped listed below 230 per 100,000 in 2010. With few exceptions, youth arrest rates for the many serious residential property offenses (i.e., those consisted of in the FBI building Crime Index) have actually been falling due to the fact that the 1990s (see number 3-3). The juvenile arrest rate for burglar has been in a steep decline, native 751 arrests every 100,000 in 1980 to fewer than 200 arrests every 100,000 in 2010. After ~ rising during the 1980s, the youth arrest rate for larceny/theft decreased steadily in between 1994 and 2005 and also then thrived slightly prior to dropping again to just above 800 arrests per 100,000 in 2010. Youth arrests for motor car theft reached a height of virtually 350 every 100,000 in the so late 1980s and plummeted to listed below 50 per 100,000 in 2010.

Other offense varieties show a really different pattern. For example, youth arrests for drug abuse violations, disorderly conduct, and “other assaults” (usually misdemeanor) increased during the duration of growing violent crime—from the mid-1980s through the mid-1990s (see figure 3-4). Yet unlike arrests for violent offenses, the number of juvenile arrests for these offenses never quite returned to pre-1990 levels. They continued to be at the


FIGURE 3-2 juvenile arrest rates for violent offenses, 1980 to 2010. *As defined by the FBI prior to 2011. SOURCES: Snyder and also Mulako-Wangota (2011). Estimates for 2010 calculated straight using data from federal Bureau of investigation (2011).

elevated levels they reached during the height of youth violence in the beforehand 1990s. As a result, the ingredient of delinquency instances processed by police ~ the youth violence optimal of the 1990s and the workload the the youth court mechanism at that time were not similar to the caseload mix the existed before the mid-1990s. As soon as the number of juvenile arrests because that these other


FIGURE 3-3 juvenile arrest prices for property offenses, 1980 to 2010. SOURCES: Snyder and also Mulako-Wangota (2011). Approximates for 2010 calculated directly using data from commonwealth Bureau of examination (2011).

offenses is contrasted directly with the variety of arrests for violent crime, the is clear that the juvenile justice mechanism in 2010 handled a various mix that offenses than in the 1990s (see figure 3-5). Special, the caseload included more youth arrested for misdemeanor assaults, medicine offenses, and also disorderly conduct and fewer youth charged v violent offenses and serious residential property offenses.

Juvenile Crimes referred to Courts

The number of thousand juvenile courts across the United states are not compelled to report case-processing data for national statistics, but, v the initiatives of the nationwide Juvenile Court Data Archive at the National facility for juvenile Justice, the country has a resource of info that comes very close to gift nationally representative. Funded due to the fact that 1975 by the Office of juvenile Justice and also Delinquency Prevention, the nationwide Juvenile Court Data save on computer (Archive) collects, stores, and analyzes data around youthful offenders referred to court for delinquency and also status offenses. Juvenile and family courts carry out the Archive v demographic


FIGURE 3-4 juvenile arrest rates for offenses not contained in the FBI Violent Crime Index, 1980 to 2010. SOURCE: Snyder and Mulako-Wangota (2011). Estimates for 2010 calculated directly using data from federal Bureau of examination (2011).

See more: Will Chocolate Ice Cream Hurt A Dog Eats Chocolate Ice Cream?

information about the juveniles, the reasons for their referral to court, and the court’s handling of each case, including whether the case involved detention, whether it led to formal charges and also adjudication, and also the last disposition of the matter. In recent years, the Archive received data about more than 1 million brand-new juvenile court instances every year indigenous jurisdictions covering an ext than 80 percent the the U.S. Juvenile populace (Puzzanchera, Adams, and Sickmund, 2011). This details was analyzed through the save staff and weighted to stand for the country as a whole.

In 2008 (the many recent data available at the moment of publication), the national estimates generated native the national Juvenile Court Data Archive said that juvenile court throughout the United claims handled an estimated 1.65 million delinquency instances (see figure 3-6). The national caseload in 2008 was much more than 40 percent bigger than the variety of cases tackled by juvenile court in 1985 (1.16 million). A building offense to be the most serious charge associated in 37 percent of delinquency situations in